|
Reverend
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: December 01, 2009, 08:58:20 AM » |
|
If you havent changed your B2B then its at 0, which is way too low for high speeds. Try 5.
4-6 seems to be the sweet spot. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Witchdoctor
|
|
« Reply #46 on: December 01, 2009, 09:52:25 AM » |
|
Yea I have to take a good look at the BIOS on this board.
Last night I was just trying to get to 5 Ghz quick for a validation
I hope to have some time this week to look at it up close and personal
way different from my Gigabyte BIOS and Asus BIOS's I am used to
But I have to beleive they are all pretty much the same just using diferent terminoligy .....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Reverend
|
|
« Reply #47 on: December 01, 2009, 10:04:12 AM » |
|
110mhz PCIE is a good place to start.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Cecil
|
|
« Reply #48 on: December 01, 2009, 10:06:49 AM » |
|
110mhz PCIE is a good place to start.
Any idea if 110 will affect my RAID setup? Lowered my multi to 17, and got 225 to boot with 105 PCIe, but 130 would cycle 23-22-21-20 over and over on the post code. Dont need it, just curios. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
gunbo13
|
|
« Reply #49 on: December 01, 2009, 10:19:52 AM » |
|
110mhz PCIE is a good place to start.
113 for me. I forget how I arrived at that number but I think it was necessary for 245+ iirc. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Reverend
|
|
« Reply #50 on: December 01, 2009, 10:38:05 AM » |
|
Any idea if 110 will affect my RAID setup? Lowered my multi to 17, and got 225 to boot with 105 PCIe, but 130 would cycle 23-22-21-20 over and over on the post code.
Dont need it, just curios.
I would recommend not using RAID because that will affect you're overall performance unless you're going for PCMark's. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Cecil
|
|
« Reply #51 on: December 01, 2009, 10:50:07 AM » |
|
I would recommend not using RAID because that will affect you're overall performance unless you're going for PCMark's.
Alright, will give it a try again after I get all my shit together. Its going on the rack this weekend, and AMD stuff going in my case for my daily PC. AMD will get the RAID, the i7 will get a WD320 AAKS. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Reverend
|
|
« Reply #52 on: December 01, 2009, 10:52:51 AM » |
|
I use RAID for every day, but when I bench, I have the cables marked, and unplug them, and plug in a single 250g and have my single storage drive attached so I can dump all of my screenshots in case of catastrophic drive scrambling.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
gunbo13
|
|
« Reply #53 on: December 01, 2009, 03:05:44 PM » |
|
I use RAID for every day, but when I bench, I have the cables marked, and unplug them, and plug in a single 250g and have my single storage drive attached so I can dump all of my screenshots in case of catastrophic drive scrambling.
I got a vraptor for XP SP3 and another vraptor for win7. You can't beat that. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Reverend
|
|
« Reply #54 on: December 01, 2009, 03:09:00 PM » |
|
I got a vraptor for XP SP3 and another vraptor for win7. You can't beat that.
Safest bet for sure. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MaadDaawg
Hound from Hell
Club NBOC Member
Karma: 10
 Offline
Posts: 1206
|
|
« Reply #55 on: December 02, 2009, 10:03:46 AM » |
|
I got a vraptor for XP SP3 and another vraptor for win7. You can't beat that.
Yeah I can, I also have a vraptor for Vista 64bit... though I NEVER use it anymore lol I have the cables marked for each OS, and only plug in the OS I'm benching plus my storage drive. Other two are left unplugged - safest way like Rev said. With the banchetto it couldnt be easier cause the SATA ports are right up front, naked to be fondled when and as needed.... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Witchdoctor
|
|
« Reply #56 on: December 02, 2009, 12:58:19 PM » |
|
aftre running PC Mark 05 on my SSD I am sold and for 100 bucks ... no brainer IMO
It will crush the V raptors reads although have heard of problems but have not even had a hickup with mine
OCZ 30GB vertex
the writes the v Raptor may get close .....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Cecil
|
|
« Reply #57 on: February 03, 2010, 12:33:46 PM » |
|
Got the new 920 yesterday, and now for some reason board is over-volting .02 at load instead of undervolting .05. I put 1.35Vcore in BIOS, get 1.37 load with DMM. VTT still drops around .03-.05 though.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Reverend
|
|
« Reply #58 on: February 03, 2010, 01:16:08 PM » |
|
totally normal Cecil when you have Without VDroop enabled.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Cecil
|
|
« Reply #59 on: February 03, 2010, 03:49:16 PM » |
|
totally normal Cecil when you have Without VDroop enabled.
I had it enabled before too, just found it wierd it changed like that. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
